Picture these two scenarios: Scenario A: You're up 5-2 heading into the ninth. Your closer comes in to lock down the opposing offense. Immediately he gives up 2 home runs. He finally settles in and gets 2 outs, but then the jitters strike again. he walks 3 batters. Bases loaded. The next batter comes up, and rips a ball into the center field gap. It looks like its game over, but the center fielder lays out for a superhuman dive to save the game, and you win. Scenario B: You come into the 9th up 5-4. Your regular closer struggles, and allows the opposing team to load the bases. The manager decides that's enough, and brings in a new reliever. He immediately gets all 3 guys out, somehow holding on to win the game. Now who pitched better? Its Player B, by a mile. Yet those two games count exactly the same in their statsheet. They both get a save. Yet MLB fans continue to worship the save as the one stat that marks a reliever's worth. Take John Franco for example. He is 7th all time on the saves leaderboard. But if you really dive deep into it, he's no more than an above average relief pitcher that got lucky on good teams throughout his career. He had a career ERA of 2.89 and a WAR of 23 in 21 years. Sure, he had the longevity, but theres at least 100 all time relievers I'd rather have as my closer than him. The only reason he reached such high save numbers is because he stuck around in the league 5 years longer than he should've just to try and climb the leaderboard.
Replies:
More Like This